Monday, September 22, 2008

learning log - research week of 9/15/2008

Learning Log for the week of 9/15/2008
WHAT: this week we learned about different kinds of research:

DESCRIPTIVE –
Describing how they are or how they were
help to generate hypothesis
getting the data not changing the data
basis for the rest of the research types,
teachers are doing this informally all the time
Types of conclusions – safe research, you don’t have to worry about changing the subject, you don’t have to worry about conclusions, changing anything, getting information and ideas
Forms it can take –case studies / methods, / observational / survey/ archival / tests / from one person to a million
Pros - quick and easy – easies to do / uses existing data / non intrusive
cons – no cause and effect, halo effect (no being observe they kids act differently)

CORRELATIONAL – strength of relationships between variables
types of conclusions - don’t change anything / Allows us to make predictions / graphs
forms it can take – all methods from descriptive but look at data in a different way
pros – does allow to make predictions, relatively easy, not changing anything
cons – no cause and effect/ haven’t sifted out other causes
example – sleep GPA

EXPERIMENTAL – Change – usually one thing only to keep variables small - use of a "treatment" (usually the independent variable) which is introduced into the research context or manipulated by the researcher. Has different groups
the manipulation of one variable on another variable, allowing conclusions about case and effect relationships. – Allows for conclusions about why behavior occurs.
Pros , allows the researcher to isolate a particular variable and focus on it in order to determine its effect on other variables. Effect
Cons - often makes the research situation unnatural / subjects may not behave normally in an experiment / virtually impossible to control all the variables / often raise serious questions about research ethics / hard to do
Randomization – groups need to be random
Dependable variables – those that are observed to change in response to independent variables ie test scores
Independent variable – those that are deliberately manipulated to invoke change-ie teac hing strategy
Quasi-experiment (‘sorta’ experiment)
types of conclusions – Why behavior occurs
forms it can take – all methods from descriptive but look at data in a different way
example – have one person drink a glass of milk, the other a gallon – who has to go to the bathroom first

ACTION – teacher based research in an individual classroom – to solve a specific problem, no outside people involved
Conclusions – reflective, specific problem solving – for this teacher this worked better
Forms – assessing teaching techniques , opinions, same as descriptive
Pros – hands on, specific Cause and effect – no transfer (next year might be different), personal to you
Cons – same as pros – takes a lot of time
No control group

SO WHAT: Why is this important to me as a teacher? Through continuing and varied research a teacher can tract student’s progress, assess the needs of students and see if the teacher’s methods are teaching the students effectively. I want to be an effective teacher.

NOW WHAT: What are you going to do about it? I want to be an effective teacher. To accomplish this goal I plan to use the different kinds of research we have learned about to continually assess my teacher skills and examine the strategies I am using to improve the way I teach.

Report on research study

Laura Garner
Ed Psych – Monday AM
Suzy Cox
September 21st, 2008

Inside Out’s School Project
A research report measuring the power of a theatre-based
program for at-risk junior high students
by James S. Catterall

This was a great article researching the effects of an after school program of theatre education for at risk kids. It included the following key measurement areas:

• Ability to work with others with whom a student disagrees.
• Ability to work with others in groups generally.
• Problem resolution skills.
• Sense of self-efficacy (the degree to which a student feels his/her actions make things happen).
• Awareness of one’s own thinking processes (metacognition).
• Attitudes about doing arts.
• Attitudes about acting.
• General outlook for the future.
• General satisfaction, happiness.

The project was experimental research, introducing one variable (theatre education) with a control group of kids from the same school who had applied for the program but weren’t able to be included because of lack of space. This control group and the experimental group both had a desire to be part of the program, making the results of the research more valid. The study was conducted through a treatment comparison design in which seventy-one program students and eighty-four non-participating comparison group students completed questionnaires before and after the students engaged in the program. Specific conditions were built into the study to raise the validity and reliability of the generalized conclusions.’ The study results found students achieving competency in theatre made significant gains in every area but one. This study also backed up other studies that support the same conclusions. That is why I love theatre!!!!



References
While not all the texts and articles listed here are referenced in this research report, each was an important source during the analysis of the data assembled.
Catterall, J. S. and Peppler, K. A.(2004). Arts Education and the Worldviews of Inner City Children. The Ford Foundation, New York.
Catterall, J. S. (2002). “Research on Drama and Theatre in Education.”Chapter in Critical Links: Learning in the Arts and Student Academic and Social Development, pages 58-62, Richard J. Deasy, editor. Arts Education Partnership, Washington, D.C.
Catterall, J. S. (1994). Different Ways of Knowing: 1991-1994 National Longitudinal Study Final Report. T he Galef Institute, Los Angeles.
De la Cruz, R. E. (1995). The Effects of Creative Drama on the Social and Oral Language Skills of Children with Learning Difficulties. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Specialized Educational Development, Illinois State University, Bloomington, Illinois.
Eccles, J. (1999). When School is Out: The Future of Children. The David and Lucile Packard Foundation, Los Angeles.
Heath S. B. (1999). “Imaginative Actuality: Learning in the Arts During the Nonschool Hours.” Chapter in Champions of Change: The Impact of the Arts on Learning, pages 19-33.The President’s Committee on the Arts and Humanities, Washington, D.C.
Horn, J. (1992). An Exploration into the Writing of Original Scripts by Inner City High School Drama Students. National Arts Education Research Center, New York; National Endowment for the Arts; United States Department of Education.
Kassab, L. (1984). A Poetic/Dramatic Approach to Facilitate Oral Communication. Unpublished Doctoral
Dissertation, Department of Speech Communication, Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania.
Podlozny (2000). “Strengthening Verbal Skills Through the Use of Classroom Drama: A Clear Link.”Journal of Aesthetic Education, volume34 (numbers 3-4), pages 239-276.
Seidel, S. (1999). “Stand and Unfold Yourself: A Monograph on the Shakespeare & Company Research Study.” Chapter in Champions of Change: The Impact of the Arts on Learning, pages 79-90. The President’s Committee on the Arts and Humanities, Washington, D.C.
Wolfe, D. P. (1999). “Why the Arts Matter in Education: Or Just What Do Children Learn When They Create an Opera?” Chapter in Champions of Change: The Impact of the Arts on Learning, pages 91-98. The President’s Committee on the Arts and Humanities, Washington D.C.

Monday, September 8, 2008

Motivation

Why am I here? To Learn. Fortunately for me - unlike conventional students who are young on life expereince - I've had plenty and know the value of education both in and out of a classroom. The degree to me isn't the main thing - although it will give me a sense of accomplishment - but what I can take from this learning experience out into my classroom as a teacher.

What motivates me? - knowing I can succeed and do well. If the task is something that doesn't interest me or I know I won't be the best at it - then I go onto something I can do well. That doesn't mean I don't try new things but they need to be in an area that interests and challenges me and that can be functional for my life.

Why do you succeed? Hard work and enthusiasm for what I'm doing.
Why do you fail? Usually its lack of motivation. I don't fail very often. :)

How do you need to change your perspecive and / or motivations in order to succeed in the secondary education program and become a GREAT!!!! teacher???
I think I'm on the right track.